Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Developmental Psychology and Value Education-James Rest essay review

"Developmental Psychology and Value Education " by James Rest Essay Review
     Published in the book Moral development,moral education, and Kohberg:basic issues in philosophy, spychology, religion, and education. (1980) ed. Brenda Munsey, attempts of identify Kohlberg's approach to moral education.
     Rest (1974) discovered that Kohlberg's theory rests on three different aspects: "structural organization, developmental sequence, and interactionism." (p. 102).
     He feels that structural organization should go beyond the simple teaching to the directives of the school, state or board, but should actually teach the child the ability to make choices and problem solve. He advocates teaching children concrete problem solving skills and the ability to think clearly.
     He views the developmental sequence as one of the most desirable of educational goals. He feels that an educator should want to attempt to move a student to a higher level of moral development. He thought that even if an educator is not able to move a student to a higher level, they should prevent the student from back-sliding to a lower level.
     Finally interactionism is described as how cognitive structures are developed. Quite often an analogy of how the human brain is like a computer is used. The main idea is that the brain is full of types of programs. Interactionists actually believe that the brain self-programs and as a result a person's experiences are organized in a way that gives them directions for moral actions. This type of learning is often called discovery learning.

Insights on Kohlberg's Moral Development, Moral Education Book

     Kohlberg Light

      Kohlberg's lengthy text Moral development, moral education, and Kohlberg: Basic issues in philosophy,psychology,religion, and education (1980). ed. Brenda Munsey. Is not for the faint of heart. This book is a series of essays written about Koghlberg's theory in regards to different fields of study.
     While my full intention was to read this tome and report on the individual sections of it for this blog and
class assignment I soon found that I had bitten off a bit more than I could chew. This book is deep discussion of his theory and an argument of,  or support of different parts of it.
     Initially I welcomed the challenge of really becoming adept at recognizing his theory in different fields. I felt it would a good overall application and that I would be able to recognize and see it in different areas. What actually happened was such a convolution of his theories in application that I have to confess I feel more confused now then when I started.
     While some sections were interesting :"Multidisciplinary Interest in Moral Development and Moral Education." (Brend Munsey), others such as; "Cognitive-Development Theory of Moral Development:Metaethical Issues," (Brenda Munsey) were far beyond my basic skill level so far.
     Kohlberg contributed as well and wrote an essay,"Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education." In his essay he discusses his six stages of moral development and feels that justice is one of the most important moral principles for this development. He feels that children operate at different levels in regards to this principle. However; according to Kohlberg (1971), "{p}sychologically, both welfare concerns (role-taking,empathy, or sympathy) and justice concerns are present at the birth of morality and at every succeeding stage." He claims that all children at all stages of development look towards the implication of and concern for justice.
     He goes on to state that while there are many values and virtues (a mixed -bag so to speak), there are only a few that children praise or blame. He feels that this evaluation of morals and virtues in necessary to growth as moral individuals. He feels that just because and adult states that they believe in honesty, it doesn't necessarily make them an honest person. They may in fact be liar. It goes beyond just a belief in a virtue. They must also be practiced.

Some videos about Kohlberg's theory and Gilligan-Kohlberg debate

http://youtu.be/CYrfV-F3x_8





http://youtu.be/eorNqHi-uGE

Moral Development,Moral Education and Kohlberg

 
 
 
The best overall serious introduction to Kohlberg's work currently available. This book is quoted more than almost any other book on Kohlberg.A distinguished international group of scholars explore the strengths and probe the weaknesses of Lawrence Kohlberg's theoretical and empirical research into the dynamics of moral develomente and the texture of moral education. This collection of original chapters carefully examines Kohlbergianism from a variety of complementary perspectives: philosophical, psychological, religious, and educational.A review in the journal ETHICS calls this book "essential reacing for anyone interested in the current issues in moral education."
 

Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development (with models)

Lawrence KohlbergA prominent cognitive-developmental theorists and American psychologist and is known for his extensive research on moral reasoning.

kohlberg.jpg














Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development

http://info.psu.edu.sa/psu/maths/Stages%20of%20Moral%20Development%20According%20to%20Kohlberg.pdf
Moral Development: involves acquiring standards about right and wrong, analyzing moral issues thoughtfully, and increasingly engaging in helpful behaviors that reflect concern for other peoples rights and needs.

Kohlberg's Model
final3.gif

New Model
final4.jpg


  • Level III: Postconventional Morality- Rarely seen before college (Stage 6 is extremely rare even in adults)
-Stage 5 Social-Contract Legalistic Orientation: People recognize that rules represent agreements among many individuals about appropriate behavior. Rules are seen as potentiality useful tools that can and help maintain social order and protect individual rights rather than as absolute dictates that must be obeyed simply because they are "the law". People also recognize the flexibility of rules; rules that no longer serve society.
-Stage6 Universal Ethical Principle Orientation: This stage is hypothetical that few people ever reach. People that do reach this stage adhere to a few abstract universal principles that transcend specific norms and rules. They answer to a "strong inner conscience and willingly disobey law that violate their own ethical principles."

Key concepts

Moral Dilemma: a situation in which two or more people's rights or needs may be at odds and for which there is no clear-cut right or wrong solution.
Preconventional morality: the earliest and least mature form of moral reasoning in that as child has not yet adopted or internalized societies conventions regarding what is right or wrong.
Conventional morality: characterized by an acceptance of society s conventions regarding right and wrong.
Post conventional morality: view rules as useful but changeable mechanism created to maintain the general social order and protect human rights, rather than as absolute dictates that must be obeyed without questions.


Moral Reasoning and Behavior

Late Adolescents (14-18 years)
-What you might observe
  • Understanding that rules and conventions help society run more smoothly
  • Increasing concern about doing ones duty and abiding by the rules of society as a whole
  • Genuine empathy for people in distress
  • Belief that society has a obligation to help those in need
-Diversity
  • For some older adolescents high moral values are a central part of their overall identity
  • Show strong commitment to to helping those less fortunate than themselves
  • Adolescents who have less advanced moral reasoning are more likely to engage in antisocial acvtivies
-Implications
  • Explore moral issues in social studies, science and literature
  • Give teens a political voice in decision making about rules and school elsewhere
Applications:
  • Provide decent role models since children learn by example
  • Offer positive feedback when children act respectful or generous to others
  • Offer support by listening to their problems
  • Encourage independent thinking by telling children to pursue what they believe in

Kohlberg and Gilligan:duet or duel? -Jorgensen article


A great article pondering the issue of whether Kholberg and Gilligan were speaking world's apart in their theories or perhaps a little bit closer than previously thought. From the Journal of Moral Education, June 2006.
http://www.d.umn.edu/~dglisczi/4501web/4501Notes/Gilligan%20%26%20Kohlberg.pdf

Comparison of Kohlberg and Gilligan's models of moral development argument

(ETHICS OF JUSTICE/RIGHTS)

A.  PRE-CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 1:  Deferring to authority

STAGE 2:  Learning to satisfy one’s own needs.

B.  CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 3:  Conforming to stereotypical roles.

STAGE 4:  Sense that individual roles contribute to social order.


C.  POST-CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 5:  Morality thought of in terms of rights and standards endorsed by society as a whole.

STAGE 6:  Morality thought of as self-chosen, universal principles of justice.


     On Kohlberg's model, moral development is the development of an autonomous self, capable of being motivated by abstract principles understood as a kind of "mathematical" solution to conflicts of interests.
GILLIGAN'S SIX STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT (ETHICS OF CARE)

A.  PRE-CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 1:  Caring for the self.

STAGE 2:  Stage 1 concern judged to be selfish.

B.  CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 3:  Goodness is caring for others, frequently equated with self-sacrifice.

STAGE 4:  Illogic of the inequality between self and others becomes evident.  Search for equilibrium.

C.  POST-CONVENTIONAL LEVEL

STAGE 5:  Focus on the dynamics of relationships, to eliminate the tension between self and others. 

STAGE 6:  Care is extended beyond personal relationships to a general recognition of the interdependence of self and other, accompanied by a universal condemnation of exploitation and hurt.

     On Gilligan's model, moral development is the development of a self-in-relation.  Morality is understood in terms of the preservation of valuable human relations.  Progress from stage to stage is motivated by increasing understanding of human relationships.

CHARACTERISIC FEATURES OF THE JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE

PARADIGM:  CONTRACTS

EMPHASIS ON:
1.  REASON and LOGIC
2.  EXPLICIT PRINCIPLES
3.  IMPARTIALITY
4.  FAIRNESS
5.  AUTONOMY
6.  RIGHTS/OBLIGATIONS
7.  GOVERNS RELATIONS
     AMONG EQUALS
8.  COMPETITION (CONFLICTING
     INTERESTS)
9.  SELF-RELIANCE



CHARACTERISIC FEATURES OF THE CARE PERSPECTIVE

PARADIGM:  CARING RELATIONSHIP (e.g. Parent-Child Relationship)

EMPHASIS ON: 
1.  EMOTIONS
2.  RESPONSIVENESS TO
     SITUATIONS
3.  PARTIALITY
4.  COMPASSION, SYMPATHY OR
     EMPATHY
5.  INTER-CONNECTEDNESS
6.  RESPONSIBILITIES
7.  GOVERNS RELATIONS AMONG
     UNEQUALS
8.  COOPERATION (COMMON INTERESTS)
9.  TRUST

Gilligan's Empirical Results

Primary Focus


Justice
Care
Both
Men
2/3
[1]
1/3
Women
1/3
1/3
1/3


From Gilligan (25).